bobby47

Sadly 'D' I won't be signing the petition. Like Colin, I wouldn't want anything to disrupt any trade agreement with the States. My view is successive British governments have cozied up to far worse regimes in the past. The yanks have elected their President, it's their Country, their democratic system, their borders and we are in no position to impose ourselves and our hypocritical false indignation upon them. Whilst I think the decision is harsh and bound to fail, it's one which the people of the States want and that's all that matters. Logically, if you think about it, whilst several Islamic nations have been targeted by the President to disrupt travel, it would be very easy for him to justify looking at nations who supply Islamic fighters, namely us and many other European countries. My warmest regards.

I'm not sure anymore that Max is right to conclude that the more people hear about this issue the louder the protests will become and thus begin a halt to the frenzied secretive spending of public money that's carried out by the hierarchy of Councils. There was a time, perhaps a few years ago, when local people had some wind in their sails and a sizeable momentum of frustration that gave promise to an end to our silence and signal to the Council and other public bodies that we'd had enough and our protests would be acted upon to bring about some transparency and herald a new era of responsible fiscal governance. But that's long gone. It's passed, and despite a barrow load of 'posts' and messure of loud protest and a huge number of leaked reports that highlighted the unbridled greed and wrongdoing that's been done beneath the umbrella of public service, buggar all has changed, nobody is any the wiser and quite frankly you could easily conclude its all been a waste of time. In fact, thinking about it, I can say without any doubt in my mind, I and others who've slaved over this very issue have completely wasted their time and effort protesting. We may as well have not bothered. Course, the reasons are many as to why 'they' can do these things. The first to acknowledge is Common Purpose. This ideology, as much as anything, is responsible for the castration and impotency of Councillors who've now been reduced to watching it all unfold from the sidelines and placed in a position where they are unable or incapable of doing anything about it. Indeed, my guess is that most Councillors wouldn't know how to challenge the issue even if they were informed enough to make a thoughtful decision. They're simply out of their depth because the Game Of Public Spending was created by Common Purpose and they, the elected politicians, have no part to play in the Game because the Game, created by Common Purpose has circumnavigated anything that stands in the way of their frenzied feeding and spending of our money. The Game was designed by the public service hierarchy, it's played only by them, the public are excluded from it and there's absolutely nothing that can be done to halt the slide. For all intents and purposes they can outsource anything, create Arms Length Companies, shred and secrete whatever they want and it's all perfectly legal. The Game is so well designed that they can take many millions of pounds of public money, shift it, move it, send it here, there and everywhere, thread it through a PLC and nobody has a right to ask, 'what's bloody happened' and better still, to protect themselves from ever being held to account and hauled before a Criminal Court, they can call upon the ideology of CP, point to the fact that everyone's at it making the problem so big and so steep to climb, anyone with an ounce of common sense would conclude, 'this is just to big for us to address. Let's leave it for a future generation to deal with. In short, The Court Dock is now so potentially overcrowded by likely defendants,those that have received multiple Gagging Payments, made vast sums from their LinkedIn contacts of public service, helped themselves to direct access to their very own PLC that can easily take from the public sector and grown rich from moving about from one failed job to another, it's now nigh on impossible to do a single thing about a silly and small few million quid that you are unable to find and have it publicly accounted for. This is the Game. This is how it was designed and despite the tragedy of it all, you've gotta tip your hat to them and acknowledge how cleverly it's all been done.

And, as an afterthought, only a woman could have delivered such a speech. Untainted by the approach of the male of the species and our collective frequent tendency to become confrontational and thus create friction, this woman quietly delivered her speech, made her points and in a very subtle and feminine way, gently nudged the mandarins of Europe not to be spiteful to their friends and try to punish the British people. Course, Juncker, Tusk, Schulz and the mad federalist called Guy from Belgium, this wise and kindly diplomatic nudge from May will probably be ignored and they'll happily destroy a hundred thousand jobs upon the mainland of Europe just to ensure that in Guy's words, 'the rats(The British) are leaving the sinking ship and we must punish Britain to stop other nations trying to leave the Union.'

Today, at Lancaster House, our Premier Theresa May made what was a remarkable and historic speech outlining how we are to extricate ourselves from the European Union. For me it was a pleasure to sit there and watch this great day unfold and I feel proud once again to be British and to now know beyond any doubt that we are most definitely leaving the madness of the Union. The speech was strong on detail, very optimistically aspirational, open and friendly, extremely pragmatic and in very clear terms she outlined the folly in Brussels attempting to punish us and subsequently destroying themselves. Happily, in a very honourable British way, she took the time to reach out to the millions of EU migrants resident in our Country who, through no fault of their own are now caught up and snared in this political event and I hope her words of comfort to them, very unlike those from Brussels, bring them some confidence that they will not have to leave Britain. We are to leave the single market, we will no longer have to tolerate the folly of The Free Movement Of People, we will regain control of our borders, our Country will no longer be tied and bound to the judiciary of European Law, our Country will be back in our hands, the funding to the EU will cease, we can trade with the outside world and it looks very much like we will leave the Customs Union that's so damaging to economic growth right across the Continent. The tide has certainly shifted in our favour. The Euro currency continues to destroy the Southern Medditeranean nations, Italy is on the brink, Greece destroyed, owned and run by Germany, many citizens across the Geographic EU area are beginning to reject the ideology of Federal Europe, Jean Claude Juncker and his deciples are falling apart, TTIP is gone and ain't coming back, and finally, if that ain't sweet enough for me, the President Elect Trump has made it perfectly clear he despises the EU and Britain will be at the front of the queue in any future trade deal. Indeed, like the USA, so many nations, sympathetic to our position have stepped forward and assured Britain that they will trade with us which has certainly helped us and strengthened the negotiating position of Britain. The only unknown in this political equation is whether or not the EU will still be standing by the time Britain has negotiated it's exit from the madness of a Union which has become the greatest man made mistake since Hitler decided that the German people required more living space.

Well done Jim. This and other equally good ideas that promote good and solid social community cohesion should have been thought of and done years ago.

Alex and Adrian, but particularly Alex. I've done it again! I've just read my exchanges with you and once again, without any outside help or assistance from anybody bloody else, I've repeated my terse writing style which once again and probably not for the last time makes me look and read overly aggressive. For this, again, I offer you my apology. My writing style is my problem and I'll try and deal with it.

A KFC would be wonderful. I love Colonel Saunders chicken and the addictive substance he dips the chicken in that makes you crave it thrice fortnightly. Course, to those of us who love his chicken, it's wonderfully good news, but sadly, for Phil, who used to hang his Vote For Me sign that he affixed high upon its front facing wall, nine foot off the ground and positioned in the middle of Men and Women, this development, this destruction of the bogs in order to give us our chicken, ain't such glad tidings. When Phil decided to scurry home, get his sign 'Vote For Me', his ladder, a hammer and a handful of masonry nails and nail it to the now gone bogs, a decision that probably Glenda and many others would have avoided, it meant that anyone who journeyed to this area whilst desperate to urinate would have seen this sign, seen the now gone bogs and as a result, subliminally speaking, thought of Phil whenever they yearned to have a pi.ss. That clever form of electioneering gets you a lot of votes. It can win you the prize, particularly when your about to vote in the booth and your desperate to urinate. No! The demolition of the bogs is not good news for everyone!

Alex, the old saying,'when you're in a hole, stop digging' aptly applies to your reasoning. There's a world of difference. They are not the same. One scenario is firmly regulated by the Statutes and one is not, albeit the Public Order Act can be and is used to halt bad language if the circumstances prove necessary. Through my simple eyes, I see one statement incorporating my bad language and someone's ethnicity as really bad and probably cruel and evil, and the other option that doesn't mention race as being far far less worse. You say, in your book they amount to the same thing. That's crazy reasoning Alex. They ain't the same lad. Nothing like the same. Finally, do me a favour,,,, I don't want this topic or anything I say or think to be associated with the evil of racism. I dont believe that society goes over the top when it responds to acts of racism and I don't believe that some people deliberately throw the racist card in order to cause a problem, so from hereon, can we leave the horrors of racism behind and just deal with fools like me who use a little bad language at a football match.

Alex, I'm not entirely sure I completely understand you, but whatever it is you've explained to me, Adrian seems to agree with you which, unsurprisingly, leads me to disagree with you both and here's why. Any abuse, if it's tainted by a racist tone is not acceptable, and unlike you both, I do not think that our society has a 'massively over the top reaction'. I believe that our zero tolerance toward racial abuse is right, fully justified and not as you've implied massively over the top. Why on earth you've extrapolated my comment, had a think about it and then associated it with what I've said with the terrible times of our black sportsman is something I can't quite grasp. Why lad do you think that societies reaction to racism in sport is massively over the top? Anyways, back to the profanities howled within the confines of Edgar Street or any other football stadia, I repeat, I'm all for it. The more colourful the better as far as I'm concerned and it's existence and use within Edgar Street doesn't cause me one sleepless moment in my nights sleep. Until the day, 'You big fat Ninny', catches on, and it ain't going to, we'll continue to use bad language to express ourselves whilst watching our team.

BillB, I'm sure you are right lad but I can't bring myself to agree with you. I'm with the new Chairman on this. As a society we've become obsessed in sanitising just about everything just in case some poor soul takes offence and consequently we've allowed everything to drift to a point where it's all been taken away and legislated against to ensure we evolve into perfect human beings and never do or say anything wrong. When I'm sat in the Merton stand, invariably freezing, because I feel the cold more than I once did, I actively encourage the use of profanity amongst my number. The ruder the better as far as I'm concerned! It's of no concern to me when the Linesman, the Ref or a member of the opposing team have their parenthood questioned, are invited to violate themselves and masturbate or instructed to clear off in the worst possible way, because the game, the match and our place in the stands is still one of the last places within our regimented society where you can be and act like you still are a working class person. Try as they might, those that want the perfectly behaved crowd who gather in congregation at the mighty, legendary, history making, noise making, howling, screaming, earth shaking E.Street crowd, will never succeed in socially engineering the people to howl, 'you dirty rotten stinker', instead of good old working class straight to the point swearing like, 'You dirty fouling cheating F'ing Bastard'. Anything less, and diluted, just doesn't sound right as far as I'm concerned and so, I say, let the swearing continue and long may it be a part of my few hours spent watching the rise of Hereford Football Club.

A very happy New Year to everyone, particularly those that I fell out with namely, Irena, Mick, H Wilson, Steve, Bill Thomas, Victor, the lists bloody endless, Alex, Paul, and it goes on, Rebecca, two others who's names I've forgotten and Widow bloody Twanky.

Paul, a happy New Year to you and yours. To'ther day I read a piece in one of the broadsheets. It was an offering by an Islamic scholar who made an attempt to explain why so many bad things have happened to Germany and other Schengen nations following the migration of the refugees from the Middle East and Africa. In a nutshell, he says this. The young men are brought up in a very repressive way which forbids sex before marriage. These men, long before they arrive in the West, see western women as figures of decadence and our society is promiscuous. Many cannot reconcile the huge gulf that exists between our culture and theirs, though the vast majority do not do harm. He says, that these vast majority of men, albeit they've been raised within the same repressive culture, all fully comprehend the difference that exists between the two cultures and are perfectly able to realise that they must change, they must work to understand these differences and they must not behave badly to a woman or do harm to another. The problem is, he explains, is that some men, brought up within this repressive society, though understanding that they must change and adapt and shouldn't do harm, are so badly desensitised by war, violence, conflict and horror, they've become psychopathic, resulting in the unrestrained mindless acts of violence which they've acted out whilst in the West. In short, he suggests that a tiny number of men, all brought up within a repressive society, all believing that the West is a decadent society, all affected by violence, arrive in the West, form gangs, which is common when your in a foreign place, the psychopathic damaged men lead, others follow and you've got chaos which I believe is somewhere near to what's actually happened. Despite the terrible events, I believe it's only a very small number who've acted savagely and that the vast majority who've settled in the West have done no harm. Paul, I'm not forwarding this for your reading with any intention of causing a fall out and I offer you my warmest regards but, like Ragwert, I believe that these people are the subject of a demonisation that fits neatly into and within our own Western personal fears of Islam and it's Muslim citizens.

Steven, it may seem like it's a waste of time, and if things go on Iike this for much longer we may pass a tipping point that'll give society no chance of repairing itself, but if the Islamic community can help themselves and soothe the rest of our social fabric, then it's possible that all these things will change for the better. Like the black West Indian communities and the Indian communities who arrived in Britain after the War, they've successfully integrated themselves,and so hopefully, sooner rather than later, the madness of Sunni and Shia and who carries the word of the Prophet Mohammed will come to an end and peace will flourish. Mind, we could be bothering ourselves over buggar all. If Russia gets fed up with the ever expanding EU, Trump turns out to be a psychopathic headbanger and we've got World War Three to contend with none of this will matter anymore anyway. My warmest regards to you and I wish you and yours a very happy Christmas.

Steven, the reason these nations have never been attacked, and it's unlikely they ever will be, is because they've never experienced or even countenanced multiculturalism within their societies. People who are not white Caucasian don't want to settle in this region of Europe and the people's of this part of Europe dont want them there either. Whilst it's politically convenient for the leaders of these Eastern regional governments to lay claim to preventing terrorist attacks by not welcoming Syrian migrants to settle, you must understand that this social approach toward people of difference has been in existence long before the global troubles involving Islamic State Terror.

Alex, I fully grasp your point of view and completely understand it. Let me say this one last thing. You, me and everyone else thinks that we're fully enlightened by events that the media delivers us. We're not. Not at all. We're driven to form our opinions by one narrative, and that's the narrative the media choose to give us. We've no choice in the matter. They tell us what to believe and it's nigh on impossible not to go with it. None of us are unaffected by its influence and for the time being, the narrative is Muslims are out to get us, want to take over the world and parts of the western world will become Caliphates. Every single day you can read some piece about something negative that confirms the fear and loathing people now have for the Islamic world and its full impact is that our views have been distorted by a piece of news that didn't quiet give us the full story, but instead, left out the parts that didn't fit the narrative that is, 'make them frightened'. A silly and unrelated example can easily be found here in Hereford. How many good people in Hereford believe that organised groups of East Europeans are flouting the law, getting rich selling us all illicit tobacco and cheap vodka. Of course, some don't believe this damaging narrative because we know better. But, the vast majority, who never read HV will believe this narrative that the EU migrants are a problem and nothing, absolutely nothing will change their minds and undo the damage that's now been done, Alex, I dont want to fall out with you or anyone else and so I'll end this exchange now, wishing you, your family and everyone else a very happy Christmas.

Alex, Yes, I'd agree that Germany needs cheap labour to prop up its economy and the edition of a grateful migrant inflation of the populus would have provided Germany with a much needed convenient boost. But, you underestimate the legacy of what World War Two and it's accompanying shame has bequeathed to the German people. They are driven to behave better and be more welcoming than other Countries in Europe. It's this, more than anything, that's sets them apart and compells them to take the moral high ground and behave in this way. Angela Merkle is a daughter of her times, saddled with the guilt of her nations past, she and many, many other German citizens decided upon this humanitarian step that's now unraveled and it most definitely was a bold and kind Christian act of kindness directed toward a people who were, are and will likely to continue to be slaughtered by forces who've got little or no thought for human life. Ask yourself this Alex. Just because the migrants are Muslim and just because Islamic extremism has gripped the world with its barbarity and evil and displayed levels of shocking violence toward their fellow man hitherto not seen since the last World War, should we in the West simply shrug our shoulders, do nothing and let them all die just in case some of their number turn out to be a malevolent force? If the answer is, we pull up the drawbridge, let them get slaughtered and look after our own,,,,,and I suspect many would go with this option that I do grasp and understand, I say it's a sad indictment on us and our values and our belief that we are better than that.

When Angela Merkle opened her doors she acted as a humanitarian, fuelled I think by two noble causes. To help the troubled Middle East region and to set an example to the rest of Europe that this is the way to behave in the modern world, and that Germany, with its dark past, has learned its historical lessons and intends to learn from them. Of course, in a democracy, one as modern as Germany, there's a price to pay from the electorate if things go wrong, and sadly, near on tragically, things have gone badly wrong on an epic scale and the Chancellor will inevitably go the way of many political Giants. She'll be shown the door. I completely understand the feelings of those who appear to be saying 'told you so'. When you consider the Cologne attacks on women, the murderous attacks upon mainland Europe and this latest act of medieval barbarism, it's no wonder people have these feelings. Course, people who see only bad in Muslim people and fear them must understand that they have to manage these perfectly normal feelings of hatred toward a group that is in global turmoil and grasp the notion that these feelings of mistrust, hatred and suspicion are the result of social behaviour that is prevelant in every single society, that is, if they look different, act different, are unlike us and not conforming to what our way of life expects, then nationalistic feelings will take root and very bad things happen. The simple truth is the Islamic religion is undergoing it's Reformation and, whilst Christians had there's five hundred years ago, the Muslims are having there's now in the full glare of the Internet and the watching liberal thinking Western world and that, coupled with so many aggravating factors has resulted in this terrible carnage, loss of life and misery to much of the World. The question now is, what do the western leaders do next?. My guess is they'll do what will win them your vote. They'll introduce legislation covering this, that and the other, denounce groups who want to stop the madness, label them far right because it's all so easy to do that, and then leave people of all colours and religious persuasion to just muddle on and get on with it. Interestingly for me, when the nations of the E8 made it abundantly clear of how they viewed these migrants, even before any problems, and they didn't want them living within their society, my initial reaction was they've learned nothing of value from history and they are racist toward people of difference. Now, after all that's happened, I still have the same view but, this feeling of growing nationalism and the us and them ideology is,for good or for bad, a trait and human characteristic that's deeply embedded in every single one of us and it's quite simply the way we all are. Personally, I don't fear the Islamic people and I certainly don't associate the murderous barbaric acts with the migrants fleeing their homeland in tiny boats. That said, many do and I do understand why they don't want to help because of 'events'. Tragically though, many people, good people, they held these firm feelings of hatred and mistrust well before Angela Merkles social engineering experiment went so badly wrong and its this, this humanistic trait of how we see difference that is sure to make the lives of good Muslim people that little harder to enjoy and be able to live in peace. As for us, we in the West, if we cannot see that little children of Islamic persuasion need to be saved and given aid, because amongst their number their might be a killer or rapist amongst them, and essentially that's now the problem, then we are no more socially advanced than the medieval barbaric religious zealot monsters who attack our way of life.

Isn't it all so sad. One of the greatest Herefordians and a true great Briton, the Reverand John Venn and all his great and wonderful life's work undone in the blink of an eye by some Tw.at who's nipples were pierced at the very same time as being adorned in his Apron of office during a secret ceremony when gifted the title of the Masonic Lodge Grand Wizard. To think that it's come to this. The great man and his remarkable works undone by a bunch of dull, unimaginative, thick, unintelligent, incompetent bungling idiots who've more respect for money grabbing chancers than they have for history, heritage, honour and all things good and decent. The Barstards! Literally, nowadays, using contacts, connections and positions of authority or influence, you can steal tens of thousands of pounds of public money and nobody bats an eyelid, yet some poor sod in a moment of weakness swipes a loaf of bread, gets caught Andy their entire world can come crashing down around them because they stole money in the traditional way instead of doing it through legal, legitimate, highly respectable and extremely profitable big commercial business.

Hello Pal, Yes, bloody charitable organisations. Course, they all start off from a high place and with a wonderful noble cause in mind, but like much of what happens nowadays, they become infested with the great and the good, they make that one crucial and strategic appointment of a Chief Executive who's off his rocker and off you go, creating layer upon layer of administration, tiers of management, pay the best to get the best Common Purpose ideology and you end up with a wealth and job creation empire that, after extracting all the public charitable donations and paying the staff salaries, the noble cause ends up receiving fifteen bloody pence out of every three quid raised. And of course, every so bloody often, around the time of a religious festival, they pay bloody Beckham to fly out to some dust bowl of a region, fix the camera lens so he's looking downwards longingly at an empty bloody well and then, after he's cuddled some poor kid and dressed him in one of his signed football shirts, he then gazes back into the lens, bubbles up with croaking emotion, weeps gallons and says, ' please donate and save a life', knowing full well that the charitable costs incurred from his bloody flight, accomodation, a bag of frozen peas to feed Victoria and God knows what else, all that's really been achieved is another line in Chapter Six of his twenty seventh Biography titled, 'I want to become a f.ucking Saint and be blessed by the bloody Pope', and be acknowledged worldwide as the greatest Briton that ever lived.

I see bloody Sting is back. Not content with his massive pile of wealth and saving the Rain Forest, he suddenly tips up in the Blackpool Tower to promote yet another song that'll make you pine and yearn for more Eurovision dross rather than listen just once more to his bloody bass guitar and one more minute of pointlessness. Then you've got bloody Bono, Geldof and bloody Beckam. Give David his Knighthood and be done with it. Is he ever at home? Whether its feeding the starving children, attending every sporting final, in every place across the globe, Comic Relief, Red rotten Noseday, all done within several time zones and at exactly the same time, he'll be there grinning and holding hands with the latest of his offspring who, in five years time, will be a bloody Ambassador to the UN promoting World bloody Peace or Global Warnng. Course, you don't see him skipping across Minefields do you. No you bloody don't mores the pity. Let's see him cozy up to some seriously contagious common folk. Lepers! That'd be worth the glory his celebrity other self craves for. And there's the crying! My God the crying. Some good and completely wonderful and brave youngster tips up at The Pride Of Britain awards ceremony, because he's battled terrible illness, fundraised thousands of pounds, donated a kidney and completed the London Marathon and the audience, full to the gunnels in bloody celebrities are there and on their feet, clapping and crying as they drink their way through a dozen bottles of Moët Chandon that the public paid for, they're there to be seen wiping away their false self promoting tears in the hope that they've managed to out cry bloody Beckham and get their publicity starved face on the front page of some magazine who's business it is to tell us all how bloody wonderful they all are.

TwoWheels & Meg, Go onto Wirral Leaks and read. Paying particular attention to The Common People & Contacts And Connections. Please read it boys. You'll be amazed at just how high the sums of money are and granted/given over to just one very wealthy person,,,,,and then note who is linked with who on different Boards Of Control and their association with the Council and their LEP. It's as bad as you can imagine.

Hello lads. Yes, back, humbled, still bruised and very keen not to fall out with anyone again. As for your comments, and in particular that of TW, it's all so true. These walls that they've constructed are now so high and steep nothing gets in and little gets out. At the heart of it all is an obsession in Reputation Management which takes priority above all else. As a tiny illustration, that perhaps goes some way to explaining to the many who don't particularly bother to much with their public services and their finances, a mate of mine is among the lower hierarchy at the Hospital. For some operational reason he quickly wanted another phone extension in his offices. Avoiding the usual protocols, he phoned up a well known provider, explained that he only wanted a junction box and a signal cable point, a new phone wasn't needed because there were loads around and they quoted him a price of just under fifty quid. It didn't happen. Not with this provider. The Trust administration stepped in, explained their contractual obligations and used their contract provider. The outcome? Just under two hundred quid plus VAT. Pay me! Pay me!Over and over again, no matter the scale of the job and it's tiny insignificance, we pay because they couldn't be bothered to show some prudence with the publics money.

Our local NHS Trust have achieved this remarkable achievement by following the ideology of Common Purpose, placing their complete faith in LinkedIn and its vast number of under achievers who swim amongst their members deluding themselves and us into ever believing that 'it's a business' and should be run in that way when it was, is and always will be a bloody service. Back to the question though. How did they manage it. Well, a start would be in giving the land the old Hospitals once sat upon away at a very commercially and highly interesting price. Next to buggar all is extremely interesting. Then you get the interested sharks from the private sector to agree to build you a new one, which, considering the future opportunities that'll emerge, they happily agree to do, just as long as they get some sugar at the very end of the feeding frenzy upon our public funds. The bloody rent! You then get some Wiley, cunning and very clever sharp suits from the private sector who've been feasting for years off the highly rewarding PFI stupidity, pop them in a room and introduce them to the public sector suits who just happen to be bloody incompetent, know nothing about how to avoid getting ripped off and eaten alive, set a rate of rent which is hugely damaging to the future well being of the Hospital and, end up wth a building that's far to small than the one the County really needed, very costly to run with an accompanying annual costs that'd destroy any public service organisation that doesn't manufacture and sell anything and can never ever service the debt that the highly paid, let's pay the best to get the best, incompetent public service suits agreed upon because they were out of their depth, largely due to the fact they'd all reached their own level of personal incompetence many years ago whilst combing the greasy pole of Public Sector Money Games. Once that's been done, you gather in all the past failures, the dross and dregs of the public sector, allow them to build their Empire Of Dirt, stock it so full of management the whole thing evolves into a bureaucratic beast of burden that begins to eat itself alive resulting in administrative chaos that's not helped because the very same idiots who gave the Hospital away to PFI are the very same ones who negotiated yet another highly expensive and badly procured project that nobody ever wanted or needed but it sounded like a good idea at the time. Then, you begin outsourcing everything to the private sector, enabling the savings of imaginary millions, the creation of thousands of imaginary jobs and the opportunity to never be held to accountability because it wasn't ever going to be your fault and just to confuse anyone who dares ever look beneath the big lie, you create loads of bloody Partnerships who are there to share in the glorious failure of it all chanting, 'lessons have been learnt' guaranteeing to everyone that they'll dig deeper and deeper before ever admitting that they buggered it all up. Next, create Arms Length companies that can secrete the dreadful failures and never be opened to public scrutiny. Then, once you start that, create some Partnerships. They're all pointless of course but it all looks so grand from their corporate perspective and adds greatly to the ever increasing cycle of confusion, chaos and the stumbling from one self created disaster to the other that's just around their corner. Then, once the private sector have created their Health Care Support company that's staffed with hundreds of Nurses and Doctors who left the local Health Trust because the money was better and the stress less, you get to lose lots more money quite quickly on staffing costs. Costs that are so high you've absolutely no chance of ever breaking even in this lopsided game of The Public Sector Cash Trough. Course, there's the hundreds of other contracts that were also negotiated between the Idiot and the private sector. Want a new phone. Pay me. New Light Bulb. Pay me. No matter what it is or how simply the job can be done. Pay me! You pay me over and over again until our contract with one another expires. In short, every single component part of our local NHS Trust is tainted by a commercial contract negotiated by an incompetent bungling idiot who's either left the gravy train or, through sheer luck,has managed to cling on despite the part they played in losing us all one hundred thousand pounds every day of our seven day week. That's pretty much how to lose that sort of money. You simply make one single crucial strategic appointment and allow that one single idiot to indulge themselves and allow their imagination to run riot.

If they ain't dancing in the Blackpool Tower Ballroom, they're doing it on ice, and if they ain't baking a bloody fruit cake to entertain us, they're on a quiz show, on a rotten bus, in a bloody house falling out with one another or in the Australian North East coast jungle eating all manner of creatures just to earn their fee, win the barstard competition and get the chance to advertise for Iceland Foods and move on to the next pointless celebrity programme where we the bloody viewers are invited to phone in and decide whether or not we want them to carry on doing buggar all that supposedly thrills us and entertains our poor souls. The barstards! There was a time, not so long ago, when their star would dim, the calls dried up, their agent told them to 'clear off and don't come back' and they ended up on the end of a coastal rotten pier playing Widow Twanky in pantomime. Not anymore mores the pity. Nowadays, when their voice goes, they can't sing a bloody note or something else prevents them performing and getting a generous round of applause, it signals the beginning of their second career of the celebrity programme entertainment circuit. What bloody next? We've already got the bloody celebrity President. It'll be bloody Pope next. The barstards! If I had anything to do with it I'd certainly introduce something harsher, some dreadful alternative that'd make them think twice about signing up for Celebrity this and Celebrity that. Shoot the barstards. By Firing Squad. If the public don't phone in on Premium Rates and acknowledge 'we like you', then take them out of the house, off the dance floor or out of the jungle, and shoot um! That'd sort it out and it'd definitely increase the viewing numbers. And if death by Firing Squad is a little to harsh for some then amputate a limb or sever a toe or finger. Anything! Beat them senseless and roll them in nettles but just stop this celebrity culture that's dominating my television screen. I know if I were a celebrity and I was fully cognisant that there was a very good chance that I could walk into the Celebrity programme and end up hopping out, I'd give it some serious consideration. And as for the Firing Squad bit, which I personally don't think is particularly harsh or excessive, we could involve our brave Armed Forces Men and Women to do the shooting,which, they've been highly trained to do in their past service to us,and then and at the same time raise some much needed revenue to help them.

I'm genuinely not surprised. The Pollsters had it wrong again and like our recent General Election, where the people couldn't admit the decades long socially engineered feeling indoctrinated into them of feeling shame for voting Tory or The Referendum where the people were to ashamed to admit they didn't want Free Movement Of People, the media were fooled and the establishment and liberal minded political classes have once again been given a bloody nose. Their game, that they've held a monopoly on is up and the times they are a changing. Next up will be Angela Merkle who, together with others, including the whole EU model that inevitably will fall apart because the people value their unique national identity, they reject the current version of globalisation and above all they want protectionist economic policies that aid their own. As for us, in Blighty, our exit from the EU will now be much smoother because the Trump administration despise the EU and, unlike Obama, who threatened our people because the establishment asked him to, this Presidency will be friendlier and more willing to accommodate us and any trade deal will get pushed upwards rather than downwards as Obarma had previously threatened. As for Mother Russia, tensions will ease, relations will become closer and hopefully there'll be a period of peaceful understanding. Unfortunately it's highly problematic. The Trump administration will tell its NATO partners that if they want to be defended then they'll be required to pay. To us and the French, who are the only European nations with anything like a decent defence budget that will be no problem. But, for many who've got no defence force and are so poor and impoverished, the requirement to pay a couple of percent of their GDP will be an impossible ask and so what happens then? Depends how hungry Russia is to reunite its former Soviet satellite states. It's a possibility that in the near future Russia will do as the Germans once did. There'll be a Land Grab that'll test the resolve of NATO and bring us all to a point where War is likely. And why will this scenario possibly become a truth? Because the European Union began its expansionistic policies hoovering up the Eastern European nations that consequently made Russia angry and threatened that their citizens might want to join the lands of plenty. History is repeating itself and we've only got ourselves to blame. We've all sat back and allowed the EU to grow from a trading market into a vast empire that's being ruled by unelected servants to huge global business conglomerate organisations that use the people to work as cheap labour with one single purpose. To generate vast profits for a few hundred people who've interest in national identity. All in all, as frightening as it might become, I'm quite pleased!